Tools for Advocacy

What Can You Do to Help?

Reforming the statutes of limitations to allow justice for victims is simply a matter of will.

Once the number of supporters passes a critical threshold, the will of the people shall be heard and the Legislatures shall hear the call for justice.


Write Your Representative

While we are currently focusing on the pending Legislative effort in New York, we encourage interested persons to contact their representatives - local, state, and national - to help effectuate SOL reform throughout the country.

Statute of Limitations: Contact Your Representative
Step #1: Find your 9-Digit Zip Code

Step #2: Search By 9-Digit Zip Code to find contact information for your elected representative:



Sample Letters

Find a few talking points by viewing examples sent to legislators to remind them of this important reform.

View Postcard Sent to NY Legislators

View Sample Letters

Visit Our Partners
• There are many organizations and individuals participating in the movement for SOL reform.

• Despite some popular misconceptions, the movement for SOL reform is not directed at any one organization. It is directed at perpetrators for the purpose of bringing justice to their victims.

View List of Partners

We encourage you to visit their sites, see what they do, and join the movement yourself.


Get Informed & Inform Others


View Testimonies
about the Reform
View Justia Columns
about the Reform

The prevalence of child sexual abuse has just come to the forefront of our national consciousness. It is not the product of one institution or entity but occurs throughout our nation. Due to the especially heinous nature of crimes against children, the time is now to reform the technicality of the statute of limitation to allow victims their day in court and their chance at justice and healing.

The following table outlines, at a glance, the problem posed by maintaining archaic statutes of limitations on child sexual abuse and what we as a society should do about it. Following the table, you may download a one-page PDF of this table. We encourage you to pass it along to friends, family, or acquaintances. Reforming the SOL on child sexual abuse is not a difficult task but it requires an informed citizenry and the sheer will of the people to protect our children through this vital reform.

  • Child sex abuse is an enormous national problem
    It is estimated that one in four women in this country have been sexually abused as a child, and one out of every five men. Compounding the problem is the simple fact that the vast majority of sexual abuse - some studies putting the number at 90% - never gets reported.
     
  • Even when victims do speak out, current statute of limitations laws for child sex abuse cases favor the abusers over the victims
    In some states, the statute of limitations on child sex abuse is too short for many victims, who often find the courage to speak out and confront their abuser or recover painful buried memories of abuse only after the statute of limitations has run out.
     
  • Neither the individual states nor the federal government have taken adequate steps to protect victims of child sex abuse
    Sexual offender lists, GPS tracking, pedophile-free zones, and harsher penalties are only effective if offenders are actually convicted and/or publicly known. Victim support programs only help those who are able to come forward. Short statutes of limitations keep the abusers from being publicly identified, restricting or defeating the effectiveness of these precautions.
     
  • Statute of limitations reform does not target specific groups
    Expanding the SOL for child sex abuse is about helping victims and holding offenders accountable regardless of their identity. When the majority of abuse is by family or family acquaintances, allegations that SOL reform is prejudicial against any institution are groundless.
     
  • States must either expand or eliminate the civil and criminal statute of limitations for child sex abuse
    State legislatures should follow the example of California, Delaware, and others to eliminate bars on when victims can bring civil suits and authorities can bring criminal charges. Regarding the statutes of limitations, child sexual abuse should be treated more like murder than like a property dispute.
     
  • The Federal government should encourage SOL reform
    Congress has already intervened in the area of child sexual abuse by creating a national registry of sex offenders and criminal laws when a child is taken across state lines. It is also constitutional for Congress to condition federal funds for health, victim support programs, or law enforcement, for example, on mandated state SOL reform or to withdraw existing funds on a failure to update statutes of limitations.
     
  • Expanded statutes of limitations result in more predators being held accountable and more victims identified
    Predators generally have more than one victim. While criminal statutes of limitations can not be retroactive, civil statutes of limitations can be. Publicly identifying predators could have the dual benefit of bringing justice to victims and preventing future abuse by the same perpetrator. When California passed reform legislation, over 300 previously unknown offenders were publicly exposed and hundreds of previously unknown victims were able to come forward.  

    View Table as PDF


Tips

Myths about the Statute of Limitations Reform


The statutes of limitations reform is not anti-Catholic, nor is it directed against the Catholic Church.

Click to learn why the statute of limitations reform is not anti-Catholic, nor is it directed against the Catholic Church

Read our document dispelling the untruths that have been circulated against the Child Victims Act and explaining the truth about the Child Victims Act by clicking HERE.


What is "Window Legislation?"
Since civil statute of limitations are legislative conveniences which may be changed at the will of the Legislature, this also means that it is constitutional for a Legislature to allow victims who have run out of time under a statute of limitations to later bring a suit. This is brought about by passing "Window Legislation" and essentially opens a specified duration in which civil claims that would have been barred can be brought.

In the area of child sexual abuse, California and Delaware have passed so-called "Window Legislation" which revived the ability of victims to bring suit.
  • In California, the window was opened in 2003 for one year and about 1,000 new suits were filed which identified approximately 300 perpetrators!

  • Delaware opened a two-year window in 2007 which expired on July 10, 2009.
One concern often raised following discussion of a window is that it will encourage frivolous claims. While some meritless or false claims can arise, the same is true in any area but one must remember that the burden of proof is still on the plaintiff to prove that the abuse occurred. This in itself, along with potential legal consequences of bringing a false claim, acts as a disincentive on frivoulous claims. In the child sexual abuse area, experience with the California window has shown that the concern with meritless suits is simply no more of a problem than in other areas of the law.
Purchase Justice Denied
Contact Your Representative

Statute of Limitations: Footer

Home « What is a SOL? « News « Tools for Advocacy « Partners for Reform « Justice Denied « Contact






Send us your INFO
about the SOL Reform!
AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE D.C. FL
GA GU HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA
ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV
NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA
PR RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA
WV WI WY


The information contained on this site is not to be construed as legal advice and is provided for informational purposes only. While the information is intended to be accurate and up-to-date, SOL-Reform.com does not provide any warranty as to the accuracy of the contents of this site. SOL-Reform.com does not assume responsibility for actions of those in reliance on this information either implied or expressed. If you are seeking legal advice, we recommend you contact a competent, independent attorney.