TMZ reports that Shattuck has reached a deal with prosecutors in which she’ll plead guilty to one count of rape in the 4th degree. When she’s sentenced in August, Shattuck could receive a sentence of 15 years.
Two bishops in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis resigned their posts Monday, the second time this spring that American church leaders have stepped aside after complaints over their handling of sexual abuse claims involving priests.
In Minnesota, Archbishop John C. Nienstedt and an auxiliary bishop, Lee A. Piché, announced their departures less than two weeks after prosecutors in St. Paul accused the archdiocese of willfully ignoring warning signs of a pedophile priest. Their resignations followed the April exit of Bishop Robert W. Finn from the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph in Missouri, who had been convicted of a misdemeanor for failing to report a priest who took pornographic pictures of girls.
Archbishop Nienstedt said in a statement Monday that his “leadership has unfortunately drawn attention away from the good works of His Church and those who perform them.”
Under Pope Francis, the Vatican has stepped up efforts to hold bishops accountable for covering up or failing to take action in sexual abuse cases, including the announcement last week of a tribunal to weigh such cases.
The Rev. Federico Lombardi, a Vatican spokesman, did not say Monday whether the two Minnesota bishops had been or would be judged by the tribunal. “It is a valid question,” Father Lombardi said. “I have no information for now.”
Asked if the formation of the tribunal might have been a factor in the resignations, Father Lombardi said, “I don’t know if you can make that specific of a connection.”
But there is a determination within the church, he said, “to face several different situations.”
Archbishop Nienstedt also attended the bishop’s conference last week in St. Louis as did the papal nuncio to the United States, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, whose portfolio includes helping to handle personnel problems in the American hierarchy.
John J. Choi, the prosecutor in Ramsey County, Minn., said the resignations would not affect his office’s criminal and civil cases against the archdiocese, which accused church leaders of failing to intervene against a priest despite repeated complaints of misconduct. That priest, Curtis Wehmeyer, has since been defrocked and imprisoned on sexual abuse charges involving boys in his parish.
“While today’s resignation will be viewed as a positive development by many in our community, the pending criminal action and civil petition and the ongoing investigation will continue,” Mr. Choi said in a statement. “As we have said, the goals of our actions are to hold the Archdiocese accountable, seek justice for the victims and our community, and to take appropriate steps to ensure that what we have alleged and intend to prove about the past conduct of church officials will never be repeated.”
In accepting the resignations, the pope appointed the Rev. Bernard A. Hebda, a coadjutor archbishop of Newark, as apostolic administrator to oversee the Minnesota archdiocese. The Vatican also announced on Monday that it would open a trial in July of its former ambassador to the Dominican Republic, Jozef Wesolowski, on charges of sexually abusing boys while he served in the Caribbean and of possessing child pornography.
The Minnesota and Missouri church leaders are hardly the first bishops to resign under scrutiny or accusations that they failed abuse victims. Since the papacy of John Paul II — now St. John Paul — began in 1978, 16 other bishops have resigned or been forced from office under a cloud of accusations that they mishandled abuse cases, according to research byBishopAccountability.org, an advocacy group in Waltham, Mass. Archbishop Nienstedt is the 17th, by that group’s count.
Archbishop Nienstedt had become one of the most embattled figures in the American Catholic hierarchy, under fire in the courts, in the pews and on newspaper editorial pages. He had refused to resign about a year ago aftercoming under sharp criticism from his own former chancellor for canonical affairs, Jennifer M. Haselberger, who charged that the church used a chaotic system of record keeping that helped conceal the backgrounds of guilty priests who remained on assignment.
He did, however, apologize at the time for his conduct, saying that while he had never knowingly covered up sexual abuse by clergy members, he had become “too trusting of our internal process and not as hands-on as I could have been in matters of priest misconduct.”
On Monday, he said he would “leave with a clear conscience knowing that my team and I have put in place solid protocols to ensure the protection of minors and vulnerable adults.”
Archbishop Nienstedt was himself the subject of two recent investigationsinto possible misconduct, though no findings of wrongdoing have been announced.
In one case, a boy told the police that the archbishop touched his buttocks while posing for a photograph after his confirmation ceremony. The archbishop denied wrongdoing and temporarily stepped aside while the authorities investigated. No charges were filed after an investigation, and Archbishop Nienstedt returned to work.
In another case, the archdiocese announced that it had received “claims regarding alleged misbehavior” against Archbishop Nienstedt that did not involve minors. The claims were said to be about a series of sexual relationships with men, including seminarians and priests. The church announced an investigation into that matter last year. The archdiocese’s communications director, Tom Halden, would not answer questions Monday about the status of that inquiry.
The Rev. Andrew Cozzens, an auxiliary bishop for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis who will remain in his post, spoke briefly to reporters Monday about the resignations. He read only from a statement, which noted that there “will be many unanswered questions as we take this significant transitional step.”
“This has been a painful process,” said Bishop Cozzens, who asked for prayers for sexual abuse survivors and for the archdiocese. “A change in leadership offers us an opportunity for greater healing and the ability to move forward.”
Critics of the archdiocese said the resignations, while not surprising, were only another step in addressing the deep-seated concerns with the archdiocese and its leaders.
Jeff Anderson, a lawyer in Minnesota who has represented victims of sexual abuse by clergy, said more top officials needed to be held accountable for their actions, and that criminal charges would be appropriate for some of them.
Mr. Anderson attributed Monday’s developments to the criminal charges against the archdiocese and unflattering disclosures made in recent civil cases. Many of those lawsuits were made possible by legislation that allowed victims to sue the church over abuse that happened years ago, and for which the statute of limitations had expired.
“This is about a culture and system that has been intractable,” Mr. Anderson said. “It needs to continue on a headlong course toward full accountability and full disclosure.”
http://sol-reform.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hamilton-Logo.jpg00SOL Reformhttp://sol-reform.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hamilton-Logo.jpgSOL Reform2015-06-16 01:31:352015-06-16 01:31:35Mitch Smith and Laurie Goodstein, 2 Bishops Resign in Minnesota Over Sexual Abuse Scandal, NY Times
The Pope’s former ambassador to the Dominican Republic, Jozef Wesolowski — accused of offenses related to child abuse — will be tried at the Vatican beginning next month, the Vatican said Monday.
Wesolowski, 66, is the highest-ranking former Vatican official to be arrested for allegations related to the sexual abuse of minors and the first to be tried on such charges at the Vatican.
Wesolowski is accused of possession of child pornography as well as offenses related to the sexual abuse of minors during his time as papal nuncio to the Dominican Republic.
Before arriving in the Dominican Republic in 2008, Wesolowski was nuncio to Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. He began his career as a priest in Krakow, Poland, in 1972 and became a bishop in 2000.
In August 2013, the Vatican said it was investigating Wesolowski and removing him from his post, but it did not give a reason. Monsignor Agripino Nunez Collado, a Catholic University rector, said an internal church report linked Wesolowski to child abuse and pedophilia.
“We have formally opened an investigation,” Dominican Attorney General Francisco Dominguez Brito told reporters at the time. “Here we have to work with two legal aspects, first national laws and also international laws in his status as a diplomat, which implies other mechanisms of investigation and judgment.”
In January 2014, Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi confirmed to the National Catholic Reporter that the Vatican’s criminal court was investigating Wesolowski. Pope Francis had announced in July 2013 that he was extending the court’s jurisdiction in sex abuse cases to include papal diplomats, making Wesolowski’s case the first test of the ruling, the newspaper reported.
The Holy See defrocked Wesolowski in June of 2014.
Wesolowski is not only charged with offenses during his five years as nuncio of Dominican Republic, but also with child pornography charges committed in Rome between August 2013, when he was recalled, and September 2014, when he was arrested, a Vatican statement said. He also faces charges in the Dominican Republic and in his native Poland, Vatican Radio reported in August.
Per the pornography allegations, Italy’s Corriere della Sera reported in September that Wesolowski’s laptop contained more than 100,000 files with pornographic images and videos, some showing naked teens, between the ages of 13 and 17, forced to have sexual relations with each other or with adults. Some had been downloaded from the Internet and others appeared to have been taken by the victims, the paper reported.
Three minors and their mothers are among the prosecution’s witnesses, according to Corriere della Sera. When Wesolowski was presented with a detention order in September, the paper reported, he issued a statement: “I can clear my position and explain the mistake.”
Though the Vatican provided few details on the sex abuse charges, Dominican investigative journalist Nuria Esperanza Piera Gainza reported in 2013 that her sources alleged Wesolowski was a regular in Santo Domingo’s Colonial Zone, where he would drink alcohol and pay children to perform sexual acts in the Monument to Friar Antonio de Montesinos, on the outskirts of the zone.
“This will be a delicate and detailed procedure, requiring the most careful observations and insights from all parties involved in the trial,” the Vatican said.
Wesolowski’s trial will involve information technology experts and international legal experts to evaluate evidence gathered in Santo Domingo, the capital of the Dominican Republic. The first hearing is scheduled for July 11.
It’s been reported that rather than being held in an Italian prison or Vatican detention cell, Wesolowski is under house arrest at a Vatican apartment for medical reasons.
The church’s sexual abuse guidelines allow local dioceses to make the initial decisions on the removal of accused priests. Papal nuncios, however, are appointed and supervised by the Vatican.
Before he was elected pope, Francis said he supported a “zero tolerance” approach to clergy sexual abuse.
In 2012, when Francis was still Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio, he said that when he was asked for advice by another bishop, “I told him to take away the priests’ licenses, not to allow them to exercise the priesthood any more, and to begin a canonical trial in that diocese’s court.”
Shortly after his election to the papacy, Francis told a senior Vatican official to “act decisively” against sexual abuse and carry out “due proceedings against the guilty.”
In July 2013, the pope made it a crime to abuse children sexually or physically on Vatican grounds. The acts were already crimes under church law, but are now specifically outlawed within the Vatican city-state, which is home to hundreds of people.
http://sol-reform.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hamilton-Logo.jpg00SOL Reformhttp://sol-reform.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hamilton-Logo.jpgSOL Reform2015-06-16 01:21:502015-06-16 01:21:50Eliott C. McLaughlin, Vatican to try former ambassador on child porn, sex abuse charges, CNN
Archbishop John Nienstedt resigned Monday, closing a troubled chapter in the history of the Catholic Church in the Twin Cities.
After two years of revelations about the failure of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis to protect children from sexual abuse at the hands of priests, Minnesotans awoke to the news that Pope Francis had taken action at last. A statement from the Vatican said the pope had accepted the resignations of both Nienstedt and Auxiliary Bishop Lee Piche.
A letter from Nienstedt on the archdiocese website admitted to no mistakes, but said that his leadership “has unfortunately drawn attention away from the good works” of the church. “Thus, my decision to step down.”
“I leave with a clear conscience knowing that my team and I have put in place solid protocols to ensure the protection of minors and vulnerable adults,” Nienstedt wrote.
Piche’s statement was briefer. “The people of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis need healing and hope. I was getting in the way of that, and so I had to resign,” he wrote. “I submitted my resignation willingly, after consultation with others in and outside the Archdiocese.”
The resignations came weeks after prosecutors in St. Paul filed criminal charges against the archdiocese for its “role in failing to protect children and contribution to the unspeakable harm” done to three sexual abuse victims of former priest Curtis Wehmeyer, now serving a five-year prison sentence for molesting two boys. He faces prosecution involving a third boy in Wisconsin.
Prosecutors said church leaders had failed to respond to “numerous and repeated reports of troubling conduct” by Wehmeyer, from the time he entered seminary until he was removed from the priesthood in 2015. The criminal complaint says many people — including parishioners, fellow priests and parish staff — spoke out about Wehmeyer, but in vain. No individual was charged.
“While today’s resignation will be viewed as a positive development by many in our community, the pending criminal action and civil petition and the ongoing investigation will continue,” said Ramsey County Attorney John Choi.
“Today’s resignations do not directly accomplish those goals,” he added, “but I believe that it is an affirmative step toward a new beginning and much needed reconciliation.”
A woman whose sons were among Wehmeyer’s victims described herself as “very relieved” at the news of the resignations. “This has been a long time coming,” she said. “Actually, I’m still hoping criminal charges will be brought.”
She said her boys, raised with television shows like “Law & Order,” have come to expect quick resolution of criminal cases. “For them to be waiting 20 months or three years, it’s been just tedious for them,” she said. Now, she added, the boys have learned that “yes, people are going to be held accountable.”
It seemed “sort of pitiful to me that it took the formal charges against the archdiocese for them to reflect on the fact that they haven’t aided in the healing” her family needs, she said.
Other players in the long drama expressed relief as well.
Jennifer Haselberger, the former top canon lawyer whose revelations first rocked the archdiocese two years ago, said she thinks Nienstedt’s resignation is a “very good sign” that the cover-up is over.
“If the blame for it lies with anyone,” she said of the resignations, “it lies with the two men themselves.”
Attorney Jeff Anderson, who represents people who have filed abuse claims against the archdiocese, said that civil cases will still proceed, but that the resignations are an important symbolic gesture to victims of clergy abuse.
“It does come with some sense of relief, because he does represent, as head of the archdiocese, the focal point of the longstanding problem,” Anderson said. “But it’s also important for everyone to realize that this whole problem is not about one man, even though he was at the top. It’s about the system and all those that have been part of it.
“This resignation signals to all of us that there is now some change being pressured at the top in a way it has never been before, and that brings promise for real change from the top on down.”
The Vatican named Archbishop Bernard Hebda, who is set to lead the Archdiocese of Newark, N.J., in 2016, to fill in temporarily as apostolic administrator for the Twin Cities.
In a letter to Twin Cities Catholics, Hebda made clear that his role will be not only temporary but part-time. “[I]t is my intention to be as available as possible, while still fulfilling my responsibilities as the coadjutor archbishop of Newark,” he wrote.
Pope Francis appointed Hebda to the New Jersey post in 2013. Hebda will serve alongside the current archbishop until July 2016, and then take over upon the retirement of his predecessor. Jim Goodness, spokesman for the Archdiocese of Newark, said that Hebda “now has two full-time/part-time or two part-time/full-time positions.”
At midday Monday, Auxiliary Bishop Andrew Cozzens made a brief statement to reporters across the street from the St. Paul Cathedral.
“There will be many unanswered questions as we take this significant transitional step to new leadership,” Cozzens said. “I pledge to you personally, though, that Archbishop Hebda and I will work closely to bring our archdiocese into a new day.”
Cozzens took no questions.
The resignations came just days after Pope Francis, who is planning to visit the United States this fall, approved the creation of a tribunal inside the Vatican to hear cases of bishops who failed to protect children from sexually abusive priests.
That action followed years of criticism that the Vatican had never held bishops accountable for having ignored warnings about abusive priests and simply moved them from parish to parish rather than report them to police or remove them from ministry.
Nienstedt’s departure makes him one of only a few American bishops to resign as the result of a clergy sex abuse scandal. In April, Pope Francis accepted the resignation of Kansas City Bishop Robert Finn, who had been convicted of failing to report a suspected child abuser. Boston’s Cardinal Bernard Law resigned in 2002 after the clergy sex abuse scandal exploded in his archdiocese.
When Nienstedt arrived in the Twin Cities in 2007, he said his priority as archbishop would be unity.
“I wanted to spend my time as being a bishop building up the unity of the church, building unity between churches, and then building a sense of harmony in the world,” he explained in a 2010 interview.
Instead, he presided over one of the most turbulent and divisive periods in the diocese’s 165-year history.
Nienstedt rose quickly through the Roman Catholic hierarchy — serving as a secretary to the archbishop of Detroit and rector of Sacred Heart Seminary. He was known as a stickler for rules, someone who embraced the Catholic Church’s teachings on abortion and same-sex marriage.
He fit in well in the conservative eras of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict. In 2001, Pope John Paul II appointed him to serve as the bishop of New Ulm, Minn.
Nienstedt became a hero to some Catholics and an embarrassment to others. He urged parishioners not to see the movie “Brokeback Mountain.” But his conservative approach reflected the mood at the Vatican at the time, and in 2007, Pope Benedict selected him to serve as the new archbishop of St. Paul and Minneapolis. There, he helped initiate and promote an unsuccessful campaign to ban gay marriage in Minnesota.
When Nienstedt arrived in the Twin Cities, the archdiocese was already decades into a cover-up of clergy sex abuse. His predecessor — Archbishop Harry Flynn — had even cut secret deals with some abusers.
As MPR News began investigating the church’s handling of abuse claims, and attorneys began preparing dozens of lawsuits, Nienstedt found himself at the center of a growing scandal.
The crisis began in the fall of 2013 when MPR News revealed that Nienstedt had authorized secret payments to priests who had sexually abused children, did not report alleged sex crimes to police and failed to warn parishioners about Wehmeyer’s sexual misconduct.
The fallout was immediate. Nienstedt’s top deputy resigned within days. Priests met with Nienstedt privately and urged him to resign. Nienstedt refused. Almost no one — priest or parishioner — came to the archbishop’s defense in any meaningful way.
At a private meeting, priests confronted Nienstedt about his decision to cover up abuse. In a secret recording obtained by MPR News, a priest can be heard shouting at Nienstedt: “Archbishop, you’re a liar, you’re a thief. You’re a coward.”
Priests were particularly angry with Nienstedt for his silence — which left them having to explain to parishioners why he had protected priests accused of sexually assaulting children.
Nienstedt publicly admitted mistakes had been made. The archbishop named a task force that cited poor oversight and flawed policies in the handling of abuse allegations.
He also faced allegations of his own. Three months after the scandal broke, police opened a criminal investigation into a claim that Nienstedt had touched a boy inappropriately. At the same time, Nienstedt secretly authorized a law firm to investigate his private life. Haselberger, the archdiocese’s former top canon lawyer, was due Monday to speak to Ramsey County prosecutors about what she had told the lawyers conducting that investigation.
Nienstedt was never criminally charged. He voluntarily “stepped aside from all public ministry” during the police investigation. He denied the allegations against him and announced the following March that he had returned to public ministry.
By then, calls for his resignation among parishioners and the public had grown.
Archbishop John Nienstedt at a press conference Friday, Jan. 16, 2015, in St. Paul, discussing the archdiocese bankruptcy filing. Jeffrey Thompson | MPR News
As the crisis deepened, Nienstedt remained largely out of the public eye. He waited eight months to grant his first interviews on the abuse scandal. In July of 2014, he told MPR News that he had been caught off guard by its reporting.
Nienstedt said he trusted others when they told him the abuse problem was in the past. “I, in a sense, didn’t see the forest for the trees,” he said. “I was aware of certain problems with misconduct on the part of different priests on a day-to-day basis, but I didn’t get the overall picture of where we stood.”
Behind the scenes, as dozens of victims came forward, the archdiocese’s attorneys plotted a course that would end in bankruptcy. In January, at a news conference to announce the bankruptcy filing, Nienstedt insisted he had no intention of resigning. He compared his relationship with the archdiocese to a marriage:
“We all know that marriages go through rough difficulties and rough times, and this is one of those times,” he said. “And it’s seven years, and that’s usually when it happens in marriage.”
http://sol-reform.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hamilton-Logo.jpg00SOL Reformhttp://sol-reform.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hamilton-Logo.jpgSOL Reform2015-06-16 01:08:352015-06-16 01:08:35Madeleine Baran, Tom Scheck, Jon Collins, Nienstedt resigns in cover-up scandal, Minnesota Public Radio
When Pope Francis called for the creation of a Vatican tribunal to ensure that every bishop be held accountable in protecting children from clergy sex abuse, he put the Church back on the road to transparency, accountability and credibility.
The enforcement tribunal the pope announced last week is critical and long overdue, and a welcome decision for those of us who love our Church.
While serving as ambassador to the Vatican for four-and-a-half years, I sensed the institutional reluctance for change and the need for a more open Church.
What people have to understand is that Pope Francis is not trying to be politically correct in advocating for church policies of openness and inclusion — it reflects who he is as a person. In fact when I first met him when he was archbishop of Buenos Aires, my first reaction after our more than half-hour conversation over cappuccino was that he’s a very humble and determined man. He reminded me of so many priests I knew growing up in South Boston and when I was mayor.
There were plenty of good priests who didn’t get credit for what they do, but then again, they never looked for recognition or thanks. Unfortunately, we only heard about the bad apples, not the overwhelming number of faithful and holy men. Priests like Fr. Dan Mahoney from Charlestown, who taught me about the dedication of firefighters and public servants; Fr. Tom McDonnell, who taught me how to love special needs children; Fr. Morris from Providence College, who taught me about treating all people with dignity and respect; and Fr. Gerry Barry, who taught me how to hit a curve ball.
This is the priesthood I know and love.
So it has really pained me over the years to hear about a small number of weak and sick men and how they have damaged the reputation of the many good priests.
Now, thanks to key advisers like Cardinal Sean O’Malley, the church is making a strong comeback. Cardinal O’Malley heads up the commission that will oversee the new tribunal, which will examine cases of bishops accused of protecting priests who abused children. In his blog last week, Cardinal O’Malley rightly noted that one of the strongest objections in the abuse crisis is that the Church has not had a mechanism to really deal with issues of accountability. “It is our hope,” he said,” that this new tribunal will be able to address that problem.”
That’s my hope, too. Our Church has not stopped trying to be more open and accountable. And, with Pope Francis at the helm, I believe our best days are yet to come.
Full article: http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/2015/06/flynn_bishops_tribunal_moving_church_out_of_scandal_s_darkness
http://sol-reform.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hamilton-Logo.jpg00SOL Reformhttp://sol-reform.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hamilton-Logo.jpgSOL Reform2015-06-16 01:01:282015-06-16 01:01:28Raymond L. Flynn, Flynn: Bishops tribunal moving church out of scandal’s darkness, Boston Herald
The Vatican announced it will establish a new tribunal to sanction bishops who fail to protect children from sexual abuse by members of the clergy.
Forgive me if I’m unimpressed.
Maybe that’s a reporter’s jadedness. I’ve spent too many years with the grim details, listening to testimony of victims, reading their depositions in civil cases and seeing how bishops did a stellar job of shielding not the child victims but the accused priests.
And it’s from living in a diocese whose bishop was convicted of failing to report suspected child abuse and was allowed by the Vatican to quietly resign this spring — more than two years after his conviction.
Yes, this move by the Holy See is a positive one. It will exist solely to hear cases involving bishops who have covered up abuse. The bishops, the leaders of the church’s dioceses, have largely escaped punishment in sex abuse scandals.
This is the Vatican playing catch-up. For many victims, altar boys and former parochial school children who are now grown men and women, it’s too late.
Rome cannot sanction the bishops who deserve the most scrutiny. Many of them — the ones who so callously ruled their dioceses in the 1960s, ’70s and ’80s — are deceased. Likewise, many pedophile priests from those eras took the secret of their sins to the grave.
Even today, some priests who have cost their dioceses millions in civil settlements are living out their senior years on tidy pensions from the church — rent, health care and daily expenses all paid. The hesitancy of bishops to defrock aging priests who were never convicted in criminal courts due to the statute of limitations is just one of the persisting issues that call into question the accountability of the hierarchy.
Under the newly announced effort, the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith will judge bishops. The June 10 decree from Rome also noted that developing this system of protocols will take five years.
The announcement comes a month after the Vatican published statutes for the Commission for the Protection of Minors, an advisory board organized in 2014 and headed by Boston’s Cardinal Sean O’Malley. O’Malley is also credited with proposing this new tribunal to sanction bishops.
To fully grasp the plodding nature of the church’s attempts at reform, one need only look a few years back. In 2002, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops promulgated the Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People, establishing a litany of reporting procedures and expectations for dioceses in the U.S. Yet in 2011, the bishops’ conference was still dodging blame. It commissioned a study that tried to blame the abuse of minors on the permissive sexual nature of society in general in the 1960s and ’70s.
Despite the new procedures in place, Catholic dioceses continue to fail to follow them. In early June, the St. Paul-Minneapolis archdiocese was named in criminal charges for failing to protect children.
Thankfully, society has stepped in where the church has lagged. Parishioners are less blindly loyal, bolstered by an openness to discuss the dangers of pedophiles. More and more children by their grade school years have been counseled about “bad touching” and what to do if an adult makes them uncomfortable. The fact that a molester could be a priest, a teacher, a coach or a relative is, thankfully, widely disseminated.
It’s taken us much longer than it should have to get to this point. As long ago as the mid-1970s, federal law put in place mandatory reporting requirements for suspected child abuse. Priests and bishops have always been included under those laws.
Why did so many of them feel free to shirk this responsibility? The answer lies in the web of attitudes and the chains of command that must unravel before this new Vatican tribunal has a remote chance of judging errant bishops appropriately.
Roman Catholics the world over are tired of lives needlessly devastated and dioceses bankrupted by clerical sexual abuse. Institutional culture is a devil of a thing, and we can count on many in the church’s hierarchy to circumvent and undermine the new protocols. But given time and determination on the part of the pope, the efforts may well solidify.
That’s a good reason to wish Pope Francis a long papacy.
Full article: http://www.kansascity.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/mary-sanchez/article23809927.html
http://sol-reform.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hamilton-Logo.jpg00SOL Reformhttp://sol-reform.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hamilton-Logo.jpgSOL Reform2015-06-13 01:55:042015-06-13 01:55:04Mary Sanchez, New Vatican tribunal to hold bishops responsible for curbing sex abuse, Kansas City Star
Molly Shattuck, Ex-NFL Cheerleader Pleads Guilty to Raping 15-Year-Old Boy, Gawker
/in Uncategorized /by SOL ReformFormer Baltimore Ravens cheerleader Molly Shattuck—the estranged wife of former Constellation Energy CEO Mayo Shattuck—has pleaded guilty to performing oral sex on a 15-year-old boy she “spotted” on Instagram, according to TMZ and the Associated Press.
TMZ reports that Shattuck has reached a deal with prosecutors in which she’ll plead guilty to one count of rape in the 4th degree. When she’s sentenced in August, Shattuck could receive a sentence of 15 years.
Ex-NFL Cheerleader Pleads Guilty to Raping 15-Year-Old Boy
Mitch Smith and Laurie Goodstein, 2 Bishops Resign in Minnesota Over Sexual Abuse Scandal, NY Times
/in Uncategorized /by SOL ReformTwo bishops in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis resigned their posts Monday, the second time this spring that American church leaders have stepped aside after complaints over their handling of sexual abuse claims involving priests.
In Minnesota, Archbishop John C. Nienstedt and an auxiliary bishop, Lee A. Piché, announced their departures less than two weeks after prosecutors in St. Paul accused the archdiocese of willfully ignoring warning signs of a pedophile priest. Their resignations followed the April exit of Bishop Robert W. Finn from the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph in Missouri, who had been convicted of a misdemeanor for failing to report a priest who took pornographic pictures of girls.
Archbishop Nienstedt said in a statement Monday that his “leadership has unfortunately drawn attention away from the good works of His Church and those who perform them.”
Under Pope Francis, the Vatican has stepped up efforts to hold bishops accountable for covering up or failing to take action in sexual abuse cases, including the announcement last week of a tribunal to weigh such cases.
The Rev. Federico Lombardi, a Vatican spokesman, did not say Monday whether the two Minnesota bishops had been or would be judged by the tribunal. “It is a valid question,” Father Lombardi said. “I have no information for now.”
Asked if the formation of the tribunal might have been a factor in the resignations, Father Lombardi said, “I don’t know if you can make that specific of a connection.”
But there is a determination within the church, he said, “to face several different situations.”
Archbishop Nienstedt also attended the bishop’s conference last week in St. Louis as did the papal nuncio to the United States, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, whose portfolio includes helping to handle personnel problems in the American hierarchy.
John J. Choi, the prosecutor in Ramsey County, Minn., said the resignations would not affect his office’s criminal and civil cases against the archdiocese, which accused church leaders of failing to intervene against a priest despite repeated complaints of misconduct. That priest, Curtis Wehmeyer, has since been defrocked and imprisoned on sexual abuse charges involving boys in his parish.
“While today’s resignation will be viewed as a positive development by many in our community, the pending criminal action and civil petition and the ongoing investigation will continue,” Mr. Choi said in a statement. “As we have said, the goals of our actions are to hold the Archdiocese accountable, seek justice for the victims and our community, and to take appropriate steps to ensure that what we have alleged and intend to prove about the past conduct of church officials will never be repeated.”
In accepting the resignations, the pope appointed the Rev. Bernard A. Hebda, a coadjutor archbishop of Newark, as apostolic administrator to oversee the Minnesota archdiocese. The Vatican also announced on Monday that it would open a trial in July of its former ambassador to the Dominican Republic, Jozef Wesolowski, on charges of sexually abusing boys while he served in the Caribbean and of possessing child pornography.
The Minnesota and Missouri church leaders are hardly the first bishops to resign under scrutiny or accusations that they failed abuse victims. Since the papacy of John Paul II — now St. John Paul — began in 1978, 16 other bishops have resigned or been forced from office under a cloud of accusations that they mishandled abuse cases, according to research byBishopAccountability.org, an advocacy group in Waltham, Mass. Archbishop Nienstedt is the 17th, by that group’s count.
Archbishop Nienstedt had become one of the most embattled figures in the American Catholic hierarchy, under fire in the courts, in the pews and on newspaper editorial pages. He had refused to resign about a year ago aftercoming under sharp criticism from his own former chancellor for canonical affairs, Jennifer M. Haselberger, who charged that the church used a chaotic system of record keeping that helped conceal the backgrounds of guilty priests who remained on assignment.
He did, however, apologize at the time for his conduct, saying that while he had never knowingly covered up sexual abuse by clergy members, he had become “too trusting of our internal process and not as hands-on as I could have been in matters of priest misconduct.”
On Monday, he said he would “leave with a clear conscience knowing that my team and I have put in place solid protocols to ensure the protection of minors and vulnerable adults.”
Archbishop Nienstedt was himself the subject of two recent investigationsinto possible misconduct, though no findings of wrongdoing have been announced.
In one case, a boy told the police that the archbishop touched his buttocks while posing for a photograph after his confirmation ceremony. The archbishop denied wrongdoing and temporarily stepped aside while the authorities investigated. No charges were filed after an investigation, and Archbishop Nienstedt returned to work.
In another case, the archdiocese announced that it had received “claims regarding alleged misbehavior” against Archbishop Nienstedt that did not involve minors. The claims were said to be about a series of sexual relationships with men, including seminarians and priests. The church announced an investigation into that matter last year. The archdiocese’s communications director, Tom Halden, would not answer questions Monday about the status of that inquiry.
The Rev. Andrew Cozzens, an auxiliary bishop for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis who will remain in his post, spoke briefly to reporters Monday about the resignations. He read only from a statement, which noted that there “will be many unanswered questions as we take this significant transitional step.”
“This has been a painful process,” said Bishop Cozzens, who asked for prayers for sexual abuse survivors and for the archdiocese. “A change in leadership offers us an opportunity for greater healing and the ability to move forward.”
Critics of the archdiocese said the resignations, while not surprising, were only another step in addressing the deep-seated concerns with the archdiocese and its leaders.
Jeff Anderson, a lawyer in Minnesota who has represented victims of sexual abuse by clergy, said more top officials needed to be held accountable for their actions, and that criminal charges would be appropriate for some of them.
Mr. Anderson attributed Monday’s developments to the criminal charges against the archdiocese and unflattering disclosures made in recent civil cases. Many of those lawsuits were made possible by legislation that allowed victims to sue the church over abuse that happened years ago, and for which the statute of limitations had expired.
“This is about a culture and system that has been intractable,” Mr. Anderson said. “It needs to continue on a headlong course toward full accountability and full disclosure.”
2 Bishops Resign in Minnesota Over Sexual Abuse Scandal – The New York Times
Eliott C. McLaughlin, Vatican to try former ambassador on child porn, sex abuse charges, CNN
/in Uncategorized /by SOL ReformMadeleine Baran, Tom Scheck, Jon Collins, Nienstedt resigns in cover-up scandal, Minnesota Public Radio
/in Uncategorized /by SOL ReformArchbishop John Nienstedt resigned Monday, closing a troubled chapter in the history of the Catholic Church in the Twin Cities.
After two years of revelations about the failure of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis to protect children from sexual abuse at the hands of priests, Minnesotans awoke to the news that Pope Francis had taken action at last. A statement from the Vatican said the pope had accepted the resignations of both Nienstedt and Auxiliary Bishop Lee Piche.
A letter from Nienstedt on the archdiocese website admitted to no mistakes, but said that his leadership “has unfortunately drawn attention away from the good works” of the church. “Thus, my decision to step down.”
“I leave with a clear conscience knowing that my team and I have put in place solid protocols to ensure the protection of minors and vulnerable adults,” Nienstedt wrote.
Piche’s statement was briefer. “The people of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis need healing and hope. I was getting in the way of that, and so I had to resign,” he wrote. “I submitted my resignation willingly, after consultation with others in and outside the Archdiocese.”
The resignations came weeks after prosecutors in St. Paul filed criminal charges against the archdiocese for its “role in failing to protect children and contribution to the unspeakable harm” done to three sexual abuse victims of former priest Curtis Wehmeyer, now serving a five-year prison sentence for molesting two boys. He faces prosecution involving a third boy in Wisconsin.
Prosecutors said church leaders had failed to respond to “numerous and repeated reports of troubling conduct” by Wehmeyer, from the time he entered seminary until he was removed from the priesthood in 2015. The criminal complaint says many people — including parishioners, fellow priests and parish staff — spoke out about Wehmeyer, but in vain. No individual was charged.
“While today’s resignation will be viewed as a positive development by many in our community, the pending criminal action and civil petition and the ongoing investigation will continue,” said Ramsey County Attorney John Choi.
“Today’s resignations do not directly accomplish those goals,” he added, “but I believe that it is an affirmative step toward a new beginning and much needed reconciliation.”
A woman whose sons were among Wehmeyer’s victims described herself as “very relieved” at the news of the resignations. “This has been a long time coming,” she said. “Actually, I’m still hoping criminal charges will be brought.”
She said her boys, raised with television shows like “Law & Order,” have come to expect quick resolution of criminal cases. “For them to be waiting 20 months or three years, it’s been just tedious for them,” she said. Now, she added, the boys have learned that “yes, people are going to be held accountable.”
It seemed “sort of pitiful to me that it took the formal charges against the archdiocese for them to reflect on the fact that they haven’t aided in the healing” her family needs, she said.
Other players in the long drama expressed relief as well.
Jennifer Haselberger, the former top canon lawyer whose revelations first rocked the archdiocese two years ago, said she thinks Nienstedt’s resignation is a “very good sign” that the cover-up is over.
“If the blame for it lies with anyone,” she said of the resignations, “it lies with the two men themselves.”
Attorney Jeff Anderson, who represents people who have filed abuse claims against the archdiocese, said that civil cases will still proceed, but that the resignations are an important symbolic gesture to victims of clergy abuse.
“It does come with some sense of relief, because he does represent, as head of the archdiocese, the focal point of the longstanding problem,” Anderson said. “But it’s also important for everyone to realize that this whole problem is not about one man, even though he was at the top. It’s about the system and all those that have been part of it.
“This resignation signals to all of us that there is now some change being pressured at the top in a way it has never been before, and that brings promise for real change from the top on down.”
The Vatican named Archbishop Bernard Hebda, who is set to lead the Archdiocese of Newark, N.J., in 2016, to fill in temporarily as apostolic administrator for the Twin Cities.
In a letter to Twin Cities Catholics, Hebda made clear that his role will be not only temporary but part-time. “[I]t is my intention to be as available as possible, while still fulfilling my responsibilities as the coadjutor archbishop of Newark,” he wrote.
Pope Francis appointed Hebda to the New Jersey post in 2013. Hebda will serve alongside the current archbishop until July 2016, and then take over upon the retirement of his predecessor. Jim Goodness, spokesman for the Archdiocese of Newark, said that Hebda “now has two full-time/part-time or two part-time/full-time positions.”
At midday Monday, Auxiliary Bishop Andrew Cozzens made a brief statement to reporters across the street from the St. Paul Cathedral.
“There will be many unanswered questions as we take this significant transitional step to new leadership,” Cozzens said. “I pledge to you personally, though, that Archbishop Hebda and I will work closely to bring our archdiocese into a new day.”
Cozzens took no questions.
The resignations came just days after Pope Francis, who is planning to visit the United States this fall, approved the creation of a tribunal inside the Vatican to hear cases of bishops who failed to protect children from sexually abusive priests.
That action followed years of criticism that the Vatican had never held bishops accountable for having ignored warnings about abusive priests and simply moved them from parish to parish rather than report them to police or remove them from ministry.
Nienstedt’s departure makes him one of only a few American bishops to resign as the result of a clergy sex abuse scandal. In April, Pope Francis accepted the resignation of Kansas City Bishop Robert Finn, who had been convicted of failing to report a suspected child abuser. Boston’s Cardinal Bernard Law resigned in 2002 after the clergy sex abuse scandal exploded in his archdiocese.
When Nienstedt arrived in the Twin Cities in 2007, he said his priority as archbishop would be unity.
“I wanted to spend my time as being a bishop building up the unity of the church, building unity between churches, and then building a sense of harmony in the world,” he explained in a 2010 interview.
Instead, he presided over one of the most turbulent and divisive periods in the diocese’s 165-year history.
Nienstedt rose quickly through the Roman Catholic hierarchy — serving as a secretary to the archbishop of Detroit and rector of Sacred Heart Seminary. He was known as a stickler for rules, someone who embraced the Catholic Church’s teachings on abortion and same-sex marriage.
He fit in well in the conservative eras of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict. In 2001, Pope John Paul II appointed him to serve as the bishop of New Ulm, Minn.
Nienstedt became a hero to some Catholics and an embarrassment to others. He urged parishioners not to see the movie “Brokeback Mountain.” But his conservative approach reflected the mood at the Vatican at the time, and in 2007, Pope Benedict selected him to serve as the new archbishop of St. Paul and Minneapolis. There, he helped initiate and promote an unsuccessful campaign to ban gay marriage in Minnesota.
When Nienstedt arrived in the Twin Cities, the archdiocese was already decades into a cover-up of clergy sex abuse. His predecessor — Archbishop Harry Flynn — had even cut secret deals with some abusers.
As MPR News began investigating the church’s handling of abuse claims, and attorneys began preparing dozens of lawsuits, Nienstedt found himself at the center of a growing scandal.
The crisis began in the fall of 2013 when MPR News revealed that Nienstedt had authorized secret payments to priests who had sexually abused children, did not report alleged sex crimes to police and failed to warn parishioners about Wehmeyer’s sexual misconduct.
The fallout was immediate. Nienstedt’s top deputy resigned within days. Priests met with Nienstedt privately and urged him to resign. Nienstedt refused. Almost no one — priest or parishioner — came to the archbishop’s defense in any meaningful way.
At a private meeting, priests confronted Nienstedt about his decision to cover up abuse. In a secret recording obtained by MPR News, a priest can be heard shouting at Nienstedt: “Archbishop, you’re a liar, you’re a thief. You’re a coward.”
Priests were particularly angry with Nienstedt for his silence — which left them having to explain to parishioners why he had protected priests accused of sexually assaulting children.
Nienstedt publicly admitted mistakes had been made. The archbishop named a task force that cited poor oversight and flawed policies in the handling of abuse allegations.
He also faced allegations of his own. Three months after the scandal broke, police opened a criminal investigation into a claim that Nienstedt had touched a boy inappropriately. At the same time, Nienstedt secretly authorized a law firm to investigate his private life. Haselberger, the archdiocese’s former top canon lawyer, was due Monday to speak to Ramsey County prosecutors about what she had told the lawyers conducting that investigation.
Nienstedt was never criminally charged. He voluntarily “stepped aside from all public ministry” during the police investigation. He denied the allegations against him and announced the following March that he had returned to public ministry.
By then, calls for his resignation among parishioners and the public had grown.
Archbishop John Nienstedt at a press conference Friday, Jan. 16, 2015, in St. Paul, discussing the archdiocese bankruptcy filing. Jeffrey Thompson | MPR News
As the crisis deepened, Nienstedt remained largely out of the public eye. He waited eight months to grant his first interviews on the abuse scandal. In July of 2014, he told MPR News that he had been caught off guard by its reporting.
Nienstedt said he trusted others when they told him the abuse problem was in the past. “I, in a sense, didn’t see the forest for the trees,” he said. “I was aware of certain problems with misconduct on the part of different priests on a day-to-day basis, but I didn’t get the overall picture of where we stood.”
Behind the scenes, as dozens of victims came forward, the archdiocese’s attorneys plotted a course that would end in bankruptcy. In January, at a news conference to announce the bankruptcy filing, Nienstedt insisted he had no intention of resigning. He compared his relationship with the archdiocese to a marriage:
“We all know that marriages go through rough difficulties and rough times, and this is one of those times,” he said. “And it’s seven years, and that’s usually when it happens in marriage.”
Nienstedt resigns in cover-up scandal _ Minnesota Public Radio News
Raymond L. Flynn, Flynn: Bishops tribunal moving church out of scandal’s darkness, Boston Herald
/in Massachusetts /by SOL ReformWhen Pope Francis called for the creation of a Vatican tribunal to ensure that every bishop be held accountable in protecting children from clergy sex abuse, he put the Church back on the road to transparency, accountability and credibility.
The enforcement tribunal the pope announced last week is critical and long overdue, and a welcome decision for those of us who love our Church.
While serving as ambassador to the Vatican for four-and-a-half years, I sensed the institutional reluctance for change and the need for a more open Church.
What people have to understand is that Pope Francis is not trying to be politically correct in advocating for church policies of openness and inclusion — it reflects who he is as a person. In fact when I first met him when he was archbishop of Buenos Aires, my first reaction after our more than half-hour conversation over cappuccino was that he’s a very humble and determined man. He reminded me of so many priests I knew growing up in South Boston and when I was mayor.
There were plenty of good priests who didn’t get credit for what they do, but then again, they never looked for recognition or thanks. Unfortunately, we only heard about the bad apples, not the overwhelming number of faithful and holy men. Priests like Fr. Dan Mahoney from Charlestown, who taught me about the dedication of firefighters and public servants; Fr. Tom McDonnell, who taught me how to love special needs children; Fr. Morris from Providence College, who taught me about treating all people with dignity and respect; and Fr. Gerry Barry, who taught me how to hit a curve ball.
This is the priesthood I know and love.
So it has really pained me over the years to hear about a small number of weak and sick men and how they have damaged the reputation of the many good priests.
Now, thanks to key advisers like Cardinal Sean O’Malley, the church is making a strong comeback. Cardinal O’Malley heads up the commission that will oversee the new tribunal, which will examine cases of bishops accused of protecting priests who abused children. In his blog last week, Cardinal O’Malley rightly noted that one of the strongest objections in the abuse crisis is that the Church has not had a mechanism to really deal with issues of accountability. “It is our hope,” he said,” that this new tribunal will be able to address that problem.”
That’s my hope, too. Our Church has not stopped trying to be more open and accountable. And, with Pope Francis at the helm, I believe our best days are yet to come.
Full article: http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/2015/06/flynn_bishops_tribunal_moving_church_out_of_scandal_s_darkness
Mary Sanchez, New Vatican tribunal to hold bishops responsible for curbing sex abuse, Kansas City Star
/in Uncategorized /by SOL ReformThe Vatican announced it will establish a new tribunal to sanction bishops who fail to protect children from sexual abuse by members of the clergy.
Forgive me if I’m unimpressed.
Maybe that’s a reporter’s jadedness. I’ve spent too many years with the grim details, listening to testimony of victims, reading their depositions in civil cases and seeing how bishops did a stellar job of shielding not the child victims but the accused priests.
And it’s from living in a diocese whose bishop was convicted of failing to report suspected child abuse and was allowed by the Vatican to quietly resign this spring — more than two years after his conviction.
Yes, this move by the Holy See is a positive one. It will exist solely to hear cases involving bishops who have covered up abuse. The bishops, the leaders of the church’s dioceses, have largely escaped punishment in sex abuse scandals.
This is the Vatican playing catch-up. For many victims, altar boys and former parochial school children who are now grown men and women, it’s too late.
Rome cannot sanction the bishops who deserve the most scrutiny. Many of them — the ones who so callously ruled their dioceses in the 1960s, ’70s and ’80s — are deceased. Likewise, many pedophile priests from those eras took the secret of their sins to the grave.
Even today, some priests who have cost their dioceses millions in civil settlements are living out their senior years on tidy pensions from the church — rent, health care and daily expenses all paid. The hesitancy of bishops to defrock aging priests who were never convicted in criminal courts due to the statute of limitations is just one of the persisting issues that call into question the accountability of the hierarchy.
Under the newly announced effort, the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith will judge bishops. The June 10 decree from Rome also noted that developing this system of protocols will take five years.
The announcement comes a month after the Vatican published statutes for the Commission for the Protection of Minors, an advisory board organized in 2014 and headed by Boston’s Cardinal Sean O’Malley. O’Malley is also credited with proposing this new tribunal to sanction bishops.
To fully grasp the plodding nature of the church’s attempts at reform, one need only look a few years back. In 2002, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops promulgated the Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People, establishing a litany of reporting procedures and expectations for dioceses in the U.S. Yet in 2011, the bishops’ conference was still dodging blame. It commissioned a study that tried to blame the abuse of minors on the permissive sexual nature of society in general in the 1960s and ’70s.
Despite the new procedures in place, Catholic dioceses continue to fail to follow them. In early June, the St. Paul-Minneapolis archdiocese was named in criminal charges for failing to protect children.
Thankfully, society has stepped in where the church has lagged. Parishioners are less blindly loyal, bolstered by an openness to discuss the dangers of pedophiles. More and more children by their grade school years have been counseled about “bad touching” and what to do if an adult makes them uncomfortable. The fact that a molester could be a priest, a teacher, a coach or a relative is, thankfully, widely disseminated.
It’s taken us much longer than it should have to get to this point. As long ago as the mid-1970s, federal law put in place mandatory reporting requirements for suspected child abuse. Priests and bishops have always been included under those laws.
Why did so many of them feel free to shirk this responsibility? The answer lies in the web of attitudes and the chains of command that must unravel before this new Vatican tribunal has a remote chance of judging errant bishops appropriately.
Roman Catholics the world over are tired of lives needlessly devastated and dioceses bankrupted by clerical sexual abuse. Institutional culture is a devil of a thing, and we can count on many in the church’s hierarchy to circumvent and undermine the new protocols. But given time and determination on the part of the pope, the efforts may well solidify.
That’s a good reason to wish Pope Francis a long papacy.
Full article: http://www.kansascity.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/mary-sanchez/article23809927.html