SOL vs. perp, employer: None

Prior to March 2015:

SOL vs. perp:           +4 years from majority = Age 22
SOL vs. employer:  +4 years from majority = Age 22

Majority Tolling:      Age 18
Discovery Tolling:    Narrow

Age of Consent:         16-18

None for most crimes (effective 1996 top counts; effective 2008 remaining counts)

2015 Pending Legislation

2016 Enrolled Legislation: H.B. 279

  • Last Action: 29 Mar 2016, Governor Signed
  • Last Location: Lieutenant Governor’s office for filing
  • Effective Date: 10 May 2016
  • Session Law Chapter: 379

View SOL Snapshot

H.B. 279 (Enrolled)

H.B. 279




Chief Sponsor: Ken Ivory

Senate Sponsor: J. Stuart Adams

6     Cosponsors:
7     Rebecca Chavez-Houck
Susan Duckworth
Angela Romero


10     General Description:
11          This bill provides a window for the revival of civil claims against perpetrators of sexual
12     abuse of a child.
13     Highlighted Provisions:
14          This bill:
15          ▸     allows child sexual abuse victims to bring a civil action against an alleged
16     perpetrator even though the statute of limitations has run;
17          ▸     provides a window of 35 years after attaining 18 years of age to commence an
18     action; and
19          ▸     specifies limitations.
20     Money Appropriated in this Bill:
21          None
22     Other Special Clauses:
23          None
24     Utah Code Sections Affected:
25     AMENDS:
26          78B-2-308, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2015, Chapter 82

28     Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:

29          Section 1. Section 78B-2-308 is amended to read:
30          78B-2-308. Legislative findings — Civil actions for sexual abuse of a child —
31     Window for revival of time barred claims.
32          (1) The Legislature finds that:
33          (a) child sexual abuse is a crime that hurts the most vulnerable in our society and
34     destroys lives;
35          (b) research over the last 30 years has shown that it takes decades for children and
36     adults to pull their lives back together and find the strength to face what happened to them;
37          (c) often the abuse is compounded by the fact that the perpetrator is a member of the
38     victim’s family and when such abuse comes out, the victim is further stymied by the family’s
39     wish to avoid public embarrassment;
40          (d) even when the abuse is not committed by a family member, the perpetrator is rarely
41     a stranger and, if in a position of authority, often brings pressure to bear on the victim to insure
42     silence;
43          (e) in 1992, when the Legislature enacted the statute of limitations requiring victims to
44     sue within four years of majority, society did not understand the long-lasting effects of abuse
45     on the victim and that it takes decades for the healing necessary for a victim to seek redress;
46          (f) the Legislature, as the policy-maker for the state, may take into consideration
47     advances in medical science and understanding in revisiting policies and laws shown to be
48     harmful to the citizens of this state rather than beneficial; and
49          (g) the Legislature has the authority to change old laws in the face of new information,
50     and set new policies within the limits of due process, fairness, and justice.
51          [(1)] (2) As used in this section:
52          (a) “Child” means a person under 18 years of age.
53          (b) “Discovery” means when a person knows or reasonably should know that the injury
54     or illness was caused by the intentional or negligent sexual abuse.
55          (c) “Injury or illness” means either a physical injury or illness or a psychological injury
56     or illness. A psychological injury or illness need not be accompanied by physical injury or

57     illness.
58          (d) “Molestation” means [touching] that a person, with the intent to arouse or gratify
59     the sexual desire of any person:
60          (i) touches the anus, buttocks, or genitalia of any child, or the breast of a female child
61     [younger than 14 years of age, or otherwise taking];
62          (ii) takes indecent liberties with a child[,]; or [causing]
63          (iii) causes a child to take indecent liberties with the perpetrator or another[, with the
64     intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any] person.
65          (e) “Negligently” means a failure to act to prevent the child sexual abuse from further
66     occurring or to report the child sexual abuse to law enforcement when the adult who could act
67     knows or reasonably should know of the child sexual abuse and is the victim’s parent,
68     stepparent, adoptive parent, foster parent, legal guardian, ancestor, descendant, brother, sister,
69     uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, grandparent, stepgrandparent, or any person cohabiting
70     in the child’s home.
71          [(g)] (f) “Perpetrator” means an individual who has committed an act of sexual abuse.
72          [(h)] (g) “Sexual abuse” means acts or attempted acts of sexual intercourse, sodomy, or
73     molestation by an adult directed towards a child.
74          [(f)] (h) “[Person] Victim” means an individual who was intentionally or negligently
75     sexually abused. It does not include individuals whose claims are derived through another
76     individual who was sexually abused.
77          [(2)] (3) (a) A [person] victim may file a civil action against a perpetrator for
78     intentional or negligent sexual abuse suffered as a child at any time.
79          (b) A [person] victim may file a civil action against a non-perpetrator for intentional or
80     negligent sexual abuse suffered as a child:
81          (i) within four years after the person attains the age of 18 years; or
82          (ii) if a [person] victim discovers sexual abuse only after attaining the age of 18 years,
83     that person may bring a civil action for such sexual abuse within four years after discovery of
84     the sexual abuse, whichever period expires later.

85          [(3)] (4) The victim need not establish which act in a series of continuing sexual abuse
86     incidents caused the injury complained of, but may compute the date of discovery from the date
87     of discovery of the last act by the same perpetrator which is part of a common scheme or plan
88     of sexual abuse.
89          [(4)] (5) The knowledge of a custodial parent or guardian may not be imputed to a
90     person under the age of 18 years.
91          [(5)] (6) A civil action may be brought only against a living person who:
92          (a) intentionally perpetrated the sexual abuse;
93          (b) would be criminally responsible for the sexual abuse in accordance with Section
94     76-2-202; or
95          (c) negligently permitted the sexual abuse to occur.
96          (7) A civil action against a person listed in Subsection (6)(a) or (b) for sexual abuse
97     that was time barred as of July 1, 2016, may be brought within 35 years of the victim’s 18th
98     birthday, or within three years of the effective date of this Subsection (7), whichever is longer.
99          (8) A civil action may not be brought as provided in Subsection (7) for:
100          (a) any claim that has been litigated to finality on the merits in a court of competent
101     jurisdiction prior to July 1, 2016, however termination of a prior civil action on the basis of the
102     expiration of the statute of limitations does not constitute a claim that has been litigated to
103     finality on the merits; and
104          (b) any claim where a written settlement agreement was entered into between a victim
105     and a defendant or perpetrator, unless the settlement agreement was the result of fraud, duress,
106     or unconscionability. There is a rebuttable presumption that a settlement agreement signed by
107     the victim when the victim was not represented by an attorney admitted to practice law in this
108     state at the time of the settlement was the result of fraud, duress, or unconscionability.

1st Sub. H.B. 279 (2/17/16)
Bill Comparison

Professor Marci A. Hamilton Testimony

Nothing Found

Sorry, no posts matched your criteria

Utah Bill to be Voted On STATUTE…

Utahns raise awareness about Child Abuse Prevention Month, Good4Utah

Nationally, April is recognized as child abuse prevention month. Organizations…

Katie McKellar, Bill removing statute of limitations in child sexual abuse cases passes Legislature, Deseret News

The Utah Legislature passed a bill Wednesday that would eliminate the statute of limitations for lawsuits against perpetrators of child sexual abuse.

Utah Resident Alert--SOL Hearing 3/11 11am MDT

Utah is making progress on expanding the SOL against the perp. All…

Thanks to these brave survivors! And UT needs to revisit its SOLs.

Victim testimony delays parole date for convicted sex offender SALT…

2015 Pending Legislation

Professor Marci A. Hamilton Testimony

Nothing Found

Sorry, no posts matched your criteria

SOL vs. perp: +12 years from majority = Age 30
SOL vs. employer: +12 years from majority = Age 30

Majority Tolling: Age 18
Discovery Tolling: No

Age of Consent: 16

Date of offense + 20 years
Effective: 8/3/06

Greta Johnson, Proposed changes to Ohio rape statute of limitations don't go far enough,

"This legislation isn't only empty and devoid of true hope for all victims; it does worse. It creates a second-class victim."

Elizabeth Faugl, Lawmaker Pushing for Change in Statute of Limitations on Rape Cases, ABC 6

The legislation, if finally signed by Governor Kasich, would lift the 20-year statute of limitations in using DNA to convict rapists in Ohio.

Jessica Anderson, Ohio rabbi accused of sexually abusing Maryland girl, The Baltimore Sun

Source: Baltimore…

Ohio Senate Considers Bill to Extend Rape SOL

by MARC KOVAC | CAPITAL BUREAU CHIEF Published: May 20, 2014…

Claudia Vercellotti commentary: Statute of limitations on sexual abuse needs a fix

Excellent oped on OH SOLs. Claudia is a fighter for survivors.

Survivor's moving victim impact statement. Must read!

Survivor's moving victim impact statement. Must read!

When SOL doesn't stand in the way, justice is possible

Prosecutor says Ohio priest raped boy in W.Va. CINCINNATI…