John Doe, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 3, Appellants, v. The Bishop of Charleston, A Corporation Sole, and The Bishop of The Diocese of Charleston, in His Official Capacity, Respondents.
good decision from SC on when the clock starts for negligent supervision claims (not from the abuse)
2013-10-10 - Waterhouse - (Del. Super. October 10, 2013 ) (sex abuse not time barred actionable post CVA)
sex abuse not time barred actionable post CVA
Doe No. 1 v. Knights of Columbus, 930 F.Supp.2d 337 (D. Conn. 2013)
holding that Connecticut’s thirty-year statute of limitations applied to Plaintiff’s negligence claims, and finding that because Plaintiff filed the action only twenty-four years after he turned eighteen, Plaintiff’s action was timely
Walker v. Three Angels Broadcasting Network, Inc., No.12–cv–114–DRH–SCW, 2012 WL 4088844 (S.D. Ill. Sept. 17, 2012)
holding that Defendant did not have standing to challenge either the legal sufficiency or timeliness of Plaintiff’s 18 U.S.C. § 2255 claims because Defendant was not a named defendant on that count, and therefore, finding that the court could not reach the merits of Defendant’s claims